Peer Review Process

All submissions will undergo a double-blind peer review process. Each manuscript will be evaluated by a minimum of two reviewers with expertise relevant to the topic. The review process will assess the submission based on:

• Relevance to the conference theme and sub-themes

• Originality and novelty of the research

• Quality and appropriateness of the methodology

• Clarity and rigor of data analysis

• Strength and logic of the arguments

• Scientific contribution to the field of education

The typical review period is 2–3 weeks, starting with an initial screening by the editorial team, followed by assignment to reviewers. Final decisions (accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject) will be made by the Conference Director, based on the reviewers’ recommendations. All review activities will be managed through the OCS platform to ensure transparency and proper documentation.

Archive Access Policy

The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.